TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether iron and steel items used as replacement parts and structural support for the Rotary Kiln and furnace were eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q; (ii) whether GC sheets used in the roof of the furnace building were eligible for Modvat credit; (iii) whether an 11 KV transformer installed in the factory after 16-3-1995 was excluded from Modvat eligibility by Notification No. 11/95-C.E. (N.T.).
Issue (i): whether iron and steel items used as replacement parts and structural support for the Rotary Kiln and furnace were eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: Items used as replacement of damaged or worn out parts of the Rotary Kiln, and items used in the structural support to the kiln, were treated as eligible capital goods in the light of prior Tribunal decisions holding such goods to fall within the scope of parts of plant, machinery, equipment, or their accessories. The reasoning accepted that structural support connected with the functioning of the plant did not lose eligibility merely because the items were fixed or became part of the supporting structure.
Conclusion: These items were held eligible for Modvat credit, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether GC sheets used in the roof of the furnace building were eligible for Modvat credit.
Analysis: GC sheets used for roofing were treated as forming part of the building housing the furnace, not part of the furnace or plant itself. The earlier decisions relied upon did not support extending capital goods treatment to materials used merely in the building structure.
Conclusion: GC sheets used in the roof of the furnace building were held ineligible for Modvat credit, against the assessee.
Issue (iii): whether an 11 KV transformer installed in the factory after 16-3-1995 was excluded from Modvat eligibility by Notification No. 11/95-C.E. (N.T.).
Analysis: The notification inserted a new clause specifically covering transformers of 75 KV and above, but it did not curtail the pre-existing coverage of plant, machinery, equipment, or their parts under the earlier clauses of Rule 57Q. A transformer supplying electricity to the manufacturing plant within the factory premises was treated as part of the plant and therefore as covered by the provision governing plant and its components.
Conclusion: The 11 KV transformer was held eligible for Modvat credit, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with Modvat credit allowed for the replacement and structural-support items and for the transformer, while credit remained disallowed for the GC sheets used in the furnace building roof.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Rule 57Q, goods that constitute parts of plant or machinery, or are used as components/accessories integral to its functioning, remain eligible for Modvat credit even if fixed or attached, but materials used merely in the building housing the plant do not qualify.
TaxTMI 
