<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51754</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi partially allowed the appeal, affirming the decision of the Adjudicating Authority regarding certain items&#039; ineligibility for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. However, it ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility of items used for replacement of parts of manufacturing equipment and the Transformer (11 KV) based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:26:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51754</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi partially allowed the appeal, affirming the decision of the Adjudicating Authority regarding certain items&#039; ineligibility for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. However, it ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility of items used for replacement of parts of manufacturing equipment and the Transformer (11 KV) based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>