Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether endoscope stents are accessories of endoscopes and therefore eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 348B of Notification No. 17/2001-Cus.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption to accessories of the specified medical equipment. The evidence on record showed that endoscopes are used not only for diagnosis but also for therapeutic procedures, and that stents are deployed through the biopsy channel for such treatment. The relevant test is whether the goods are an adjunct or accompaniment, or an addition for the convenient use of the main equipment. On that basis, the fact that the stents are not permanently attached to the endoscope or may be imported separately was held to be irrelevant. The materials relied on established that stents are essential for endoscopic treatment and enhance the effective use of the equipment.
Conclusion: The stents were held to be accessories of endoscopes and entitled to exemption under Sl. No. 348B of Notification No. 17/2001-Cus.
Ratio Decidendi: An article qualifies as an accessory when it serves as an adjunct or accompaniment to the main equipment and is necessary for its convenient and effective use, including therapeutic use, even if it is not permanently attached or imported together with the main equipment.