Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported cardiac stent was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 17/2001-Cus. as an accessory to the PTCA catheter.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the same notification granted exemption to medical equipment specified in the relevant list and to accessories of such equipment. It relied on an earlier decision holding that stents could be treated as accessories to an endoscope, and observed that a cardiac stent carried and deposited through a PTCA catheter stood on an even stronger footing. The Tribunal also took into account the subsequent notification specifically covering cardiac stents and the absence of any judicial authority cited against exemption.
Conclusion: The cardiac stent was treated as an accessory to the PTCA catheter and the exemption claim was accepted.