Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported Da Vinci surgical system was eligible for exemption as a fibre optic endoscope under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002, and consequently whether waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties should be granted.
Analysis: The imported equipment was found, on the product literature and surrounding evidence, to be a composite Da Vinci surgical system comprising multiple components such as a surgical console, surgical arm cart, vision system, endowrist instruments, and a high resolution 3-D endoscope. The endoscope was only one part of the entire system and the description of the goods had been altered at the applicant's instance. The exemption claimed was specific to fibre optic endoscopes, not to a complete surgical system containing an endoscope as one component. No financial hardship was shown to justify waiver of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: The benefit of the notification was not available to the imported system, and the request for waiver of pre-deposit was rejected. The applicant was directed to deposit the duty amount, with waiver of penalties to follow upon such deposit during the pendency of the appeal.