Adventure in the nature of trade: land resale profits are taxable and stock-in-trade valuation governs computation.

A land transaction may be treated as an adventure in the nature of trade where the totality of facts shows a profit-making venture, including intention at acquisition, subdivision into plots, multiple sales, and lack of capacity to hold the land as an investment. On those facts, the surplus is taxable as business profit. For computation, trading profits must be determined on ordinary commercial accounting principles, and stock-in-trade must be valued at the beginning and end of the accounting period. The retained land was part of the trading asset and was properly brought into account at its value in computing profit, resulting in an assessment against the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the land transaction constituted an adventure in the nature of trade and the resulting surplus was taxable as business profit; (ii) Whether the profit from the venture was properly ascertained by valuing the land retained by the assessee as stock-in-trade.

Issue (i): Whether the land transaction constituted an adventure in the nature of trade and the resulting surplus was taxable as business profit.

Analysis: The character of a transaction of this kind depends on the total impression created by all the proved facts and circumstances, and no single abstract test is conclusive. Relevant indicators include the intention at the time of acquisition, the manner in which the property was dealt with, the organisation or scheme employed, and whether the transaction was carried out as part of a profit-making venture. On the facts, the assessee entered the arrangement with a view to resale at a profit, divided the estate into several plots, arranged sales to multiple purchasers, and lacked the resources to hold or cultivate the land as an investment.

Conclusion: The transaction was an adventure in the nature of trade and the surplus was taxable; the finding was against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the profit from the venture was properly ascertained by valuing the land retained by the assessee as stock-in-trade.

Analysis: In a trading adventure, profits must be computed according to ordinary commercial accounting principles, subject to the statute, and stock-in-trade must be brought into account at the beginning and end of the accounting period. The retained plot formed part of the trading asset of the venture, and its value was properly taken into account in computing the profit for the relevant year.

Conclusion: The profit was correctly computed by treating the land as stock-in-trade and valuing the retained portion accordingly; the finding was against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the land dealings were treated as a trading venture and the assessed surplus was held to be taxable income.

Ratio Decidendi: Whether a land transaction is an adventure in the nature of trade must be determined from the cumulative effect of all relevant facts, and in a trading venture profit is computed by applying ordinary commercial accounting principles, including valuation of stock-in-trade.

---