Investment shares and separate portfolios can keep short-term gains taxable as capital gains, not business income.

Short-term gains on shares held as investments were not assessable as business income where the assessee's intention and the surrounding facts showed an investment portfolio rather than trading activity. The Court applied the settled distinction between shares held as investment and stock-in-trade, noted that a taxpayer may maintain separate investment and trading portfolios, and treated holding period as only one relevant factor. Separate accounts, use of surplus funds, demat classification as investments, and acceptance of substantial investment income as capital gains supported the conclusion that the disputed transactions retained investment character. The gains were therefore assessable as short-term capital gains, not business income.

---

---

Issues: Whether the short-term capital gains arising from shares held as investments were liable to be assessed as business income, or whether they retained the character of capital gains.

Analysis: The determination depended on the intention of the assessee and the totality of the surrounding circumstances, no single test being conclusive. The Court relied on the settled distinction between shares held as investment and shares held as stock-in-trade, the recognition that a taxpayer may maintain two separate portfolios, and the CBDT circular clarifying that the period of holding is only one relevant factor. It noted that the assessee maintained separate investment and trading accounts, deployed own surplus funds, reflected the shares as investments in the demat account, and had substantial investment income already accepted as capital gains. The short-term gains in dispute formed a small part of the overall investment income, and the factual materials relied on by the assessing officer were not enough, by themselves, to convert the investment transactions into trading transactions.

Conclusion: The disputed gains could not be treated as business income and were to be assessed as short-term capital gains.

Ratio Decidendi: Whether a share transaction is an investment or an adventure in the nature of trade must be decided on the assessee's intention and the cumulative effect of all relevant facts and circumstances, and frequency or short period of holding alone is not decisive where separate investment and trading portfolios are maintained.

---