Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the expenditure of Rs. 42,338 was properly allowed as a deduction in the assessment year 1953-54 in respect of a single venture undertaken to produce one picture.
Analysis: The business was confined to the production of one film, and the result of the venture could not be ascertained piecemeal by splitting expenditure into separate heads or by treating part of the production outlay as relating to an earlier year. In a single venture of this kind, the commercial result is known only when the picture is completed and released, and the entire expenditure incurred for its production is relevant to the computation of profit or loss for the year in question. The distinction sought to be drawn between establishment expenses and production expenses was held to be artificial on the facts.
Conclusion: The deduction of Rs. 42,338 was rightly allowed and the question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a business consists of a solitary, indivisible venture, its profit or loss must be determined on completion of that venture, and expenditure incurred for its production cannot be disintegrated on an artificial year-wise or head-wise basis if the commercial result is ascertainable only at completion.