Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund was admissible where duty had been paid on an invoice value higher than the contract price because of a mistake in the invoice.
Analysis: The contract price for the transformer was fixed at a lower amount and there was no dispute that the buyer was not liable to pay anything beyond that agreed price. The higher value shown in the invoice was an inadvertent error, and duty had been paid on that mistaken figure. Since the excess duty was paid only due to the wrong invoice value and the actual transaction value was the contract price, the refund claim was properly allowed.
Conclusion: The refund of excess duty was admissible and the Revenue's appeal had no merit.