TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Upholds Denial of Modvat Credit Beyond Time Limit</h1> The court upheld the denial of Modvat credit to M/s. Modi Xerox Ltd. for availing it beyond the prescribed time limit under Rule 57G(2). The ... Modvat - Adjustment of credit Issues:1. Availment of Modvat credit beyond the prescribed time limit under Rule 57G(2).2. Interpretation of Rule 57E and its relation to Rule 57G.3. Applicability of time limits for availing Modvat credit under Rule 57E.Issue 1: Availment of Modvat credit beyond the prescribed time limit under Rule 57G(2):The case involved M/s. Modi Xerox Ltd. availing Modvat credit of Rs. 2,65,079.89 based on supplementary invoices issued by M/s. Supreme Industries Ltd. The dispute arose as the credit was taken after six months from the date of issue of these invoices, leading to proceedings against M/s. Modi Xerox Ltd. The Asst. Commissioner confirmed the demand, and the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was unsuccessful, upholding the original authority's decision.Issue 2: Interpretation of Rule 57E and its relation to Rule 57G:The appellant's advocate argued that Rule 57E, dealing with the adjustment of duty credit, does not specify a time limit within itself. They contended that Rule 57G, which sets a time limit of six months for availing credit, should not be extended to Rule 57E as they address different scenarios. However, the Revenue's representative argued that since Rule 57E references Rule 57G, the time limits under Rule 57G should apply to credit availed under Rule 57E.Issue 3: Applicability of time limits for availing Modvat credit under Rule 57E:The appellate authority analyzed the provisions of Rule 57E and Rule 57G(2) to determine the eligibility for availing Modvat credit. It was established that Rule 57E does not prescribe specific documents for availing credit, and Rule 57G(2) specifies the necessary documents for credit availing. As the appellants took credit beyond six months from the date of supplementary invoices, they were found in violation of the time limit set by the second proviso to Rule 57G(2). The judgments cited by the appellant were deemed irrelevant to the case, and the appeal was rejected, upholding the lower authorities' decisions.In conclusion, the judgment upheld the denial of Modvat credit to M/s. Modi Xerox Ltd. due to availing it beyond the stipulated time limit, as per Rule 57G(2). The interpretation of Rule 57E in conjunction with Rule 57G was crucial in determining the eligibility for credit availing, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
