Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods was admissible when the declaration under Rule 57T was filed after the first receipt of capital goods but within the prescribed period from the date on which the premises became a factory and commenced manufacture.
Analysis: Rule 57T required a manufacturer intending to take credit on capital goods under Rule 57Q to file a declaration before the Assistant Commissioner, with a proviso permitting delayed filing within the allowable period on sufficient cause being shown. The dispute turned on whether the relevant starting point for computing the period was the first receipt of capital goods or the date when the premises acquired the character of a factory and manufacturing activity began. The declaration was filed after registration and commencement of production, and the delay had been condoned. The rule was applied in the light of the definition of factory under Section 2(e) of the Central Excise Act and the earlier Tribunal decisions relied upon by the assessee.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible and the declaration was treated as having been validly filed within time from the date the factory came into existence and manufacture commenced.
Ratio Decidendi: For Modvat credit on capital goods, the declaration period under Rule 57T is to be computed from the date the premises becomes a factory for manufacturing purposes, and not mechanically from the date of the first receipt of capital goods.