Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods received before registration of the factory could be denied on the ground that the declaration was filed after receipt of the goods, and whether the relevant period under Rule 57T should be counted from the date of registration of the factory.
Analysis: The factory was under construction when the capital goods were received, and the declaration for Modvat credit was filed before registration. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions holding that in the case of a new factory, the period under Rule 57T is to be reckoned from the date of registration, and that credit should not be denied merely because the declaration was not filed simultaneously with receipt of the capital goods. The reasoning also proceeded on the basis that there was uncertainty regarding filing requirements for a factory under establishment and that a denial of credit in such circumstances would be unjust.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to Modvat credit on the capital goods, and the impugned order denying credit was set aside.