Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing standard profits under the Excess Profits Tax Act, the standard period could be split year-wise so as to exclude foreign profits of one assessment year by first determining residency status under the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The standard period chosen under section 6 of the Excess Profits Tax Act was a single unit, and the profits for that period had to be computed as a whole. Rule 1 of Schedule I required the business profits of the standard period to be computed on the principles applicable under section 10 of the Income-tax Act, under which both Indian and foreign profits could enter the computation. The question of whether the assessee was resident or non-resident under section 4A of the Income-tax Act arose only after business profits had first been determined and could not be used at the threshold to exclude foreign profits from the standard period computation.
Conclusion: The foreign profits for the relevant assessment year were rightly includible in the standard period computation, and the exclusion made by the Excess Profits Tax Officer was incorrect.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, and the computation adopted by the Tribunal and the High Court was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For computing standard profits under the Excess Profits Tax Act, the business profits of the chosen standard period must be determined as a whole under the income-tax computation rules, and residency status cannot be applied beforehand to exclude profits from that computation.