Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the surplus realised on sale of the shares was a revenue receipt arising from business or an accretion to capital, and consequently not chargeable to tax.
Analysis: The shares were acquired as part of a single, indivisible arrangement to secure the managing agency of the sugar company and not as stock-in-trade or with an intention to deal in shares. There was no general share-dealing business, and the transaction was not split into a profit-making part and a managing-agency part. When the object of obtaining the managing agency failed, the shares were sold and the resulting surplus represented the realisation of a capital investment. The receipts were casual and non-recurring, and they did not arise from business within the meaning of the exemption claim.
Conclusion: The surplus was capital accretion and not taxable business income; the decision was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The sale proceeds were held to be non-taxable capital receipts rather than revenue receipts, and the assessee's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where shares are acquired solely as part of a capital arrangement to secure an enduring commercial advantage and not for trading, the surplus on their later sale is capital accretion and not income from business.