Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the compensation received for compulsory vacation of business premises was a capital receipt or a revenue receipt, and whether it was exempt under section 4(3)(vii) of the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The receipt was examined in the context of the claim made and the accompanying letter, which showed that the amount was sought and paid for disturbance and loss of business during the period the business remained stopped and could not be restarted at a new place. No claim for loss of goodwill or injury to any capital asset was made or proved. The payment was therefore linked to loss of profits and not to any diminution of the profit-making apparatus or other capital asset. A sum received as compensation for temporary interruption of trading activity is a trading receipt and not a capital receipt.
Conclusion: The receipt was held to be a revenue receipt and not exempt under section 4(3)(vii) of the Income-tax Act; the questions were answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The compensation was taxable as business income because it represented loss of profits arising from interruption of trade and not compensation for injury to capital.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation received for interruption of business activity is a revenue receipt where it is referable to loss of profits rather than injury to capital assets or goodwill.