Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compensation received for divesting the assessee-company of the management of its life insurance business was a capital receipt or income liable to tax.
Analysis: The compensation was paid under the Life Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1956 for the vesting of management in the Central Government. The Court held that the character of the receipt depended on the nature and reason of the payment, not merely on the mode of quantification. The management of the company was treated as part of its profit-making apparatus and, in substance, as property. Once the assessee was divested of its own management, it could not carry on business through a management of its choice. The payment was therefore for the loss of a capital asset and not for profits earned in the course of business. The fact that the amount was measured by past profits did not convert it into income.
Conclusion: The compensation was a capital receipt and not taxable income; the question was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the revenue and the assessee-company succeeded with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation paid for compulsory divestment of a business's management, where such management forms part of the profit-making apparatus, is a capital receipt and does not become income merely because it is quantified by reference to past profits.