Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received by a tenant on surrender of tenancy rights and vacating the premises was a capital receipt and, if so, whether it was chargeable to tax as capital gains or as business income.
Analysis: The receipt was paid in consideration of relinquishment of tenancy rights and not as compensation for loss of business or earnings. A tenancy right is capable of being a capital asset, but where no cost of acquisition can be identified for acquiring that right, the computation provisions for capital gains cannot be applied. In such a situation, section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be invoked to levy capital gains tax. The payment also did not fall within business income under section 28, since it was not made for any business loss or interruption.
Conclusion: The receipt was a capital receipt in the hands of the assessee and was not taxable as capital gains or as revenue income.