Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (2) TMI 646 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules on tax treatment of Transferable Development Rights The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that the receipts from the sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) were not chargeable to capital gains ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal rules on tax treatment of Transferable Development Rights

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that the receipts from the sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) were not chargeable to capital gains tax. It also confirmed the allowance of exemptions under Sections 54 and 54F. Additionally, the Tribunal held that Section 50C did not apply to the transfer of development rights and validated the reassessment proceedings under Section 148 initiated by the Income Tax Officer.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Chargeability of receipts from the sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDRs)/Floor Space Index (FSI) to capital gains tax.
                            3. Consistency in tax treatment for co-owners of the same property.
                            4. Applicability of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act to development rights.
                            5. Allowance of exemptions under Sections 54 and 54F of the Income Tax Act.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Initiation of Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 148:
                            The learned Income Tax Officer initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 148, which the assessee challenged. The reassessment was based on the consideration of stamp duty valuation as deemed sale consideration and the cost of construction deduction under Sections 54 and 54F. The learned CIT(A) upheld the reassessment, and the assessee did not press further on this issue during the appeal.

                            2. Chargeability of Receipts from the Sale of TDRs/FSI to Capital Gains Tax:
                            The primary issue was whether the receipts from the sale of TDRs/FSI were chargeable to capital gains tax. The learned CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the sale of TDRs was not chargeable to capital gains tax, citing the Bombay High Court decision in CIT vs. Shambhaji Nagar Co-op Housing Society Ltd. (370 ITR 325). The Tribunal upheld this view, noting that the TDRs did not have a cost of acquisition, and thus, the receipts could not be taxed as capital gains. This decision was supported by multiple precedents, including the coordinate Bench's decisions in similar cases.

                            3. Consistency in Tax Treatment for Co-Owners of the Same Property:
                            The learned CIT(A) and the Tribunal addressed the inconsistency in tax treatment between the assessee and his brother, who were co-owners of the same property. The brother had treated the receipt from the sale of TDRs as chargeable to capital gains tax, which was upheld by the ITAT. However, the assessee claimed that the receipts were not chargeable to capital gains tax. The Tribunal distinguished the two cases, noting that the brother's case involved a different claim and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision in favor of the assessee.

                            4. Applicability of Section 50C to Development Rights:
                            The learned AO argued that Section 50C, which deals with the valuation of land or building for stamp duty purposes, should apply to the transfer of development rights. The CIT(A) disagreed, stating that Section 50C applies only to the transfer of land and buildings, not development rights. The Tribunal upheld this view, noting that the development rights were separate from the land and building and thus not subject to Section 50C.

                            5. Allowance of Exemptions Under Sections 54 and 54F:
                            The learned AO had denied the assessee's claim for exemptions under Sections 54 and 54F, arguing that the cost of improvement could not be included in the cost of the new flat for claiming deductions. The CIT(A) allowed the exemptions, which the Tribunal upheld, noting that the assessee had substantiated the claim of deposit in the capital gain account scheme and its utilization for the purpose of purchasing a flat.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the learned AO, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision that the receipts from the sale of TDRs were not chargeable to capital gains tax and that the exemptions under Sections 54 and 54F were correctly allowed. The Tribunal also noted that Section 50C did not apply to the transfer of development rights and that the reassessment proceedings under Section 148 were valid.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found