Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the land from which the assessee derived agricultural income remained "assessed to land revenue" within the meaning of section 2(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act after the land revenue had been redeemed by a lump-sum capitalised payment.
Analysis: The land had originally been subject to recurring land revenue, but the Government accepted a lump-sum payment equal to the capitalised value of the revenue and thereafter conveyed the land as free and discharged from all Government land revenue or any charge in the nature thereof. The redemption was not a mere suspension of collection; it extinguished the recurring revenue demand in perpetuity. Once the whole land revenue was commuted and redeemed, the land ceased to remain assessed to land revenue and became revenue-free in law and in fact.
Conclusion: The land was not assessed to land revenue for the purpose of section 2(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, and the assessee was not entitled to claim exemption on that basis.
Ratio Decidendi: A capitalised lump-sum redemption of land revenue extinguishes the recurring assessment of land revenue and converts the land into revenue-free land, so it no longer satisfies the statutory requirement of being "assessed to land revenue".