Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1955 (2) TMI 20 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Land revenue assessment limits depend on clear statutory or deed-based exemption; acquisition and absolute Crown sale did not create revenue-free tenure. A pre-existing limit on land revenue must be clearly established: the Foras Act was read as confining assessment to the rent then payable, but land ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Land revenue assessment limits depend on clear statutory or deed-based exemption; acquisition and absolute Crown sale did not create revenue-free tenure.

                            A pre-existing limit on land revenue must be clearly established: the Foras Act was read as confining assessment to the rent then payable, but land acquisition did not extinguish the Government's separate prerogative to assess land to revenue. The Crown sale deed also did not create revenue-free tenure, because it expressly subjected the lands to cesses, taxes, rates, assessments, dues and duties. The earlier Foras tenure did not revive after acquisition and absolute sale, and no implied statutory exemption arose after repeal of the Foras Act. On that footing, the Government's assessment notices were valid.




                            Issues: (i) Whether the Foras Act, 1851 limited the Government's right to levy assessment on the lands to the assessment then payable; (ii) whether the land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act No. VI of 1857 extinguished the Government's right to assess the lands to revenue; (iii) whether the Crown grant/sale deed conferred a right to hold the lands revenue-free; and (iv) whether the original Foras tenure revived in the hands of the purchasers so as to continue the old assessment limit.

                            Issue (i): Whether the Foras Act, 1851 limited the Government's right to levy assessment on the lands to the assessment then payable.

                            Analysis: The Act extinguished the Company's reversionary rights but expressly saved the rents then payable and provided that they would continue to be payable. Though the drafting was inartistic, those words indicated that the assessment recoverable by Government was confined to the amount then payable and did not authorise enhancement beyond that figure.

                            Conclusion: The Foras Act imposed a specific limitation on assessment, and the lands were subject to assessment only up to the then existing rate.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act No. VI of 1857 extinguished the Government's right to levy assessment on the lands.

                            Analysis: The acquisition statute vested the lands in Government free from other estates, rights, titles and interests, but the Government's prerogative right to assess land was not an interest acquired from the claimants. The acquisition extinguished the occupants' interests, not the Government's taxing right, which was outside the subject-matter of acquisition and need not be valued or compensated.

                            Conclusion: The land acquisition proceedings did not extinguish the Government's right to levy assessment.

                            Issue (iii): Whether the Crown grant/sale deed conferred a right to hold the lands revenue-free.

                            Analysis: The Crown Grants Act, 1895 did not support an implied exemption from revenue merely because the transfer was absolute. The deed itself subjected the lands to all cesses, taxes, rates, assessments, dues and duties then or thereafter payable, which negatived any claim to revenue-free holding.

                            Conclusion: The sale deed did not confer any right to hold the lands free of assessment.

                            Issue (iv): Whether the original Foras tenure revived in the hands of the purchasers so as to continue the old assessment limit.

                            Analysis: Once the lands were acquired by Government, the entire prior estate and its incidents stood extinguished. The subsequent absolute sale by Government conveyed freehold title, not the old Foras tenure. The repeal of the Foras Act also meant that no surviving statutory right could be revived by implication.

                            Conclusion: The Foras tenure did not revive, and the old assessment limit did not continue.

                            Final Conclusion: The Government's right to assess the lands under the Bombay City Land Revenue Act was not curtailed by the Foras Act, the acquisition proceedings, or the sale deed, and the assessment notices were valid.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A pre-existing limitation on land revenue must be clearly established; acquisition of land by Government extinguishes the occupants' interests but not the Crown's prerogative right to assess, and an absolute Crown sale will not imply revenue-free tenure where the deed expressly subjects the land to taxes and assessments.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found