Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to reversal of the amounts entered in the inputs credit registers and the working out of 8% amount under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944; whether the applicability of Rule 57CC had to be examined with reference to Rule 57A and Rule 57C; and whether compliance with Notification No. 5/98-C.E. dated 2-6-1998 required determination.
Analysis: The Tribunal had not determined the contentious questions concerning the interrelationship of Rule 57CC with Rule 57A and Rule 57C, nor had it examined the respondent's entitlement to reversal of credit or compliance with the notification. Since these issues were material to the dispute and had remained undecided, further consideration was necessary.
Outcome: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, leaving all contentions open.