Detention based on incomplete material fails when later analysis does not support the alleged misdeclaration.

Detention based on a misdeclaration allegation failed where the authority relied on incomplete material and acted before the chemical analysis report clarified the nature of the goods. The notice and report indicated alloy steel, but did not establish that the goods were forged machined items as declared. Because one of the grounds for detention rested on irrelevant or insufficient material, the detention could not stand and was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the detention order was sustainable when the principal ground was founded on material that was not adequate and had been acted upon before the chemical analysis report clarified the nature of the goods.

Analysis: The detention was primarily based on the premise that the export consignment was scrap metal and had been misdeclared. The show cause notice and the later chemical analysis indicated that the samples were made of alloy steel, while the report did not establish that they were forged machined goods as declared. The basis for the detention order was therefore incomplete and the authority acted before the relevant material was available. Once one of the grounds of detention rests on irrelevant or insufficient material, the detention cannot survive.

Conclusion: The detention order was unsustainable and was set aside.

---