TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether payments to non-resident entities for online advertising services were taxable as royalty or otherwise chargeable to tax in India, requiring tax deduction at source and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether the discount on shares issued under an Employee Stock Option Scheme was allowable as a business expenditure.
Issue (i): Whether payments to non-resident entities for online advertising services were taxable as royalty or otherwise chargeable to tax in India, requiring tax deduction at source and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The advertising platform provided by the non-resident entities was a standard facility for displaying advertisements. The assessee had no control over, access to, or managerial role in the servers or equipment used for providing the platform, and possessed no economic or possessory right in the servers. The payments were therefore not for the use or right to use equipment, nor did they constitute royalty or fees for technical services. The Revenue did not controvert the factual findings or the applicability of the assessee's earlier case-law.
Conclusion: The advertising payments were not royalty or otherwise chargeable to tax in India so as to require deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was not sustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether the discount on shares issued under an Employee Stock Option Scheme was allowable as a business expenditure.
Analysis: The discount on issue of employee stock options represented employee cost recognised over the vesting period. Applying the Special Bench principle adopted in the assessee's own case, the discount was treated as expenditure incurred in connection with employment and allowable in computing business income, subject to appropriate adjustments for options exercised, vested, or lapsed.
Conclusion: The ESOP discount was an allowable deduction as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Final Conclusion: The deletion of both the advertisement-expense disallowance and the ESOP-expense disallowance was sustained, leaving no surviving disallowance on the issues adjudicated.
Ratio Decidendi: Payments for a standard online advertising facility do not constitute royalty where the payer has no right to use, control over, or possessory interest in the service provider's equipment or servers; discount on employee stock options is deductible as employee cost incurred for business purposes.
TaxTMI 
