TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether goods specified in the tariff but attracting nil rate of duty, such as journals, newsletters and periodicals, are to be included as excisable goods while computing the aggregate value of clearances under Condition 2(vii) of Notification No. 8/2003-CE; (ii) Whether the computation of aggregate clearances for deciding SSI eligibility required fresh adjudication in light of the appellant's claim regarding export sales and other non-includible components.
Issue (i): Whether goods specified in the tariff but attracting nil rate of duty, such as journals, newsletters and periodicals, are to be included as excisable goods while computing the aggregate value of clearances under Condition 2(vii) of Notification No. 8/2003-CE.
Analysis: Condition 2(vii) of Notification No. 8/2003-CE applies the threshold with reference to the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods for home consumption in the preceding financial year. Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 defines excisable goods as goods specified in the schedules to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as being subject to duty of excise. On that basis, goods appearing in the tariff remain excisable goods even where the applicable tariff rate is nil. The distinction sought to be made between goods exempted by notification under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and goods carrying a nil tariff rate was not accepted, since nil rate of duty was treated as a rate of duty for this purpose.
Conclusion: Goods attracting nil rate of duty are includible as excisable goods for computing the aggregate value of clearances under Notification No. 8/2003-CE; this issue was decided against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the computation of aggregate clearances for deciding SSI eligibility required fresh adjudication in light of the appellant's claim regarding export sales and other non-includible components.
Analysis: The record showed that documents were produced in support of the claim that export sales and certain other items should not be included in the turnover for determining whether the threshold of Rs. 400 lakhs was crossed. Since those documents appeared not to have been placed before or considered by the authorities below, the computation of the aggregate value of clearances was found to be incomplete. As SSI eligibility depended upon correct verification of those figures, fresh scrutiny by the adjudicating authority was necessary.
Conclusion: The computation issue was remitted for fresh determination of the aggregate value of clearances after examining the claim relating to export sales and similar components; this issue was decided partly in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Nil-rated tariff goods must be counted as excisable goods for SSI threshold purposes, but the assessee's entitlement to the exemption for the relevant years depends on a fresh factual recomputation of aggregate clearances after proper verification of the supporting records.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of SSI exemption based on aggregate clearances, goods specified in the tariff remain excisable goods even when chargeable at nil rate of duty, and where material evidence affecting threshold computation has not been considered, the determination of eligibility must be remitted for fresh verification.
TaxTMI 
