Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excise duty on goods manufactured before the budget but removed after the rate became effective was payable on the basis of the date of manufacture or the date of removal, and whether goods exempted at the time of manufacture ceased to be excisable goods.
Analysis: Excise is a duty on manufacture or production, but under the scheme of the Central excise law the levy and collection may be postponed for administrative convenience to the stage of removal. Rule 9A provides for application of the rate prevailing on the date of removal, while the taxable event remains manufacture. Goods do not cease to be excisable merely because they were exempt at an earlier stage, and the descriptive reference to goods being subject to duty does not alter the nature of the levy.
Conclusion: The duty was correctly levied with reference to the date of removal, and the assessee's contention based on the date of manufacture was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the taxable event is manufacture, the rate of excise duty may validly be applied at the time of removal under the governing rules, and exemption at the time of manufacture does not convert excisable goods into non-excisable goods.