TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether special excise duty under Section 37 of the Finance Act, 1978 was leviable on goods manufactured before 1 March 1978 but removed on or after that date; (ii) whether amounts collected as special excise duty on such pre-levy manufactured goods were refundable and unpaid amounts could be recovered.
Issue (i): Whether special excise duty under Section 37 of the Finance Act, 1978 was leviable on goods manufactured before 1 March 1978 but removed on or after that date.
Analysis: Special excise duty is an excise duty relatable to Entry 84 of List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India, and the taxable event is manufacture or production of goods. Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 creates the levy, while the Rules regulate collection. Rule 9 and Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 shift only the stage of collection to removal for administrative convenience and do not convert removal into the taxable event. Since the special levy came into force only on 1 March 1978, goods manufactured before that date were outside the levy even if cleared later. The earlier decision in Wallace Flour Mills did not apply because it concerned an existing excisable commodity and a change in rate, not a fresh levy.
Conclusion: The special excise duty was not leviable on goods manufactured before 1 March 1978 merely because they were removed on or after that date.
Issue (ii): Whether amounts collected as special excise duty on such pre-levy manufactured goods were refundable and unpaid amounts could be recovered.
Analysis: Although the duty was held not payable on pre-1 March 1978 manufactured goods, the Court directed that assessees should not obtain refunds of amounts already collected on or after 1 March 1978 in respect of such goods. The Court also directed that where duty remained unrecovered on such goods, recovery could be made according to law. These directions were made to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and discriminatory consequences.
Conclusion: Refunds were denied for amounts already collected, and unpaid amounts were held recoverable according to law.
Final Conclusion: The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, the assessees' appeals were allowed subject to the Court's directions, and the controversy over special excise duty on pre-levy manufactured goods was resolved in favour of the assessees on liability, but not on refund of amounts already collected.
Ratio Decidendi: For excise purposes, the taxable event is manufacture or production, not removal; statutory rules may regulate collection at the stage of removal for convenience, but they cannot impose a fresh excise levy on goods manufactured before the levy commenced.
TaxTMI 
