Notional rent on builder stock-in-trade, section 14A settlement, and regularisation under revenue deduction were all addressed by the Tribunal.

For assessment years before insertion of section 23(5), unsold flats held as stock-in-trade by a builder were not to be taxed on a notional annual letting value merely because they remained vacant, and the Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate-bench view in deleting the deemed-rent addition. The Tribunal also sustained a restricted disallowance under section 14A where the assessee had ed an additional amount in settlement proceedings and the first appellate authority limited the disallowance accordingly. It further treated the payment to a municipal authority for regularisation of a club-house extension as a revenue expenditure under section 37(1), since it was not regarded as a penal outgo, and deleted the disallowance.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether notional annual letting value of unsold flats held as stock-in-trade by a builder could be assessed as income from house property for assessment years prior to the insertion of section 23(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be restricted in view of the settlement proceedings; and (iii) whether the amount paid to the municipal authority for regularisation of club-house extension was allowable as a revenue deduction under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue (i): whether notional annual letting value of unsold flats held as stock-in-trade by a builder could be assessed as income from house property for assessment years prior to the insertion of section 23(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The property in question consisted of unsold residential units shown as inventory in the business of a builder and developer. The controversy turned on the treatment of such stock-in-trade for assessment years before the statutory carve-out introduced by section 23(5). The Bench followed its own earlier coordinate-bench view in the assessee's case and held that the reassessed notional rent on the unsold stock could not be sustained on the facts of the present years.

Conclusion: The addition on account of deemed annual letting value was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be restricted in view of the settlement proceedings.

Analysis: The assessee had offered an additional amount towards disallowance in settlement proceedings for multiple assessment years, and that offer had been accepted in the settlement order. In that factual setting, the Tribunal accepted the restricted disallowance determined by the first appellate authority and declined to interfere with the balance deletion.

Conclusion: The restricted disallowance was upheld and the revenue's challenge failed.

Issue (iii): whether the amount paid to the municipal authority for regularisation of club-house extension was allowable as a revenue deduction under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The payment was made for regularisation of construction and was not found to be a penalty for contravention of law. Following the assessee's own earlier year decision, the Bench treated the expenditure as not falling within the mischief of penal outgoings and accepted the appellate relief.

Conclusion: The disallowance was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the principal dispute concerning deemed rent on unsold stock, while the revenue's objection to the restricted section 14A disallowance and the section 37(1) deletion was rejected, resulting in composite relief to the assessee and dismissal of the revenue's appeals.

Ratio Decidendi: For assessment years prior to the statutory insertion of section 23(5), unsold flats held as stock-in-trade by a builder were not liable to be brought to tax on a notional rental basis merely because they remained vacant.

---