Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to regular bail in view of the alleged paper-leak offence, the period of custody already undergone, the stage of trial, and the criminal antecedents relied upon against him.
Analysis: The allegation concerned leakage of a question paper and use of unfair means in the REET examination. The petitioner had remained in custody for a substantial period, the investigation had resulted in filing of a charge-sheet with further investigation still continuing, and the trial had not commenced though a large number of witnesses were to be examined. Co-accused had already been granted bail in several cases. The antecedents noted by the High Court were explained as one case having been withdrawn and the other ending in a closure report, though the protest petition was pending. Without entering into the merits, these factors were treated as sufficient to consider release on bail.
Conclusion: Regular bail was granted to the petitioner subject to furnishing bail bonds and complying with the specified conditions, including deposit of passport if any, attendance before the trial court, cooperation in the trial, non-interference with witnesses, and retention of attached immovable property.