Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer was without jurisdiction in view of the faceless assessment scheme and the CBDT notification dated 29.03.2022.
Analysis: The scheme of faceless assessment was held to apply from the stage of notice under Sections 148 and 148A. Section 151A, read with the notification dated 29.03.2022 and Section 144B, was treated as making the faceless mechanism applicable to issuance of notice under Section 148. It was further held that assessment proceedings begin with the issuance of show cause notice, and that circulars, instructions, or office memoranda cannot override the statutory mandate.
Conclusion: The notice under Section 148 issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer was unsustainable, and the writ petition was disposed of in terms of the earlier coordinate bench decisions, leaving the revenue free to proceed in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the reassessment notice succeeded on the jurisdictional issue, and the matter was concluded by following the earlier binding coordinate bench rulings.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute and the applicable CBDT notification make the faceless scheme operative from the notice stage, a notice under Section 148 issued by the jurisdictional officer is without jurisdiction, and administrative instructions cannot prevail over the statutory scheme.