Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Liquidator could be permitted to seek discharge on the footing that the corporate debtor had been sold as a going concern; whether the Liquidator had complied with statutory filing and disclosure obligations during liquidation; and whether further directions were required regarding receivables, pending litigations, project status, accounts, and fees.
Analysis: The liquidation record showed that the corporate debtor had been sold as a going concern, but the materials placed before the Authority disclosed unresolved issues concerning unsold assets, receivables, bank guarantees, retention money, statutory filings, and the status of several contracts and projects. The Authority noted inconsistencies in the Liquidator's disclosures, non-compliance with earlier directions, and the absence of a complete final report and full account of realisations and disbursements. It further observed that the Liquidator's obligations continued until a transparent and complete liquidation process was concluded in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016.
Outcome: The request for discharge was not granted at this stage, and the Liquidator was directed to file a detailed compliance affidavit covering receivables, litigations, project status, accounts, fees, and statutory filings, with a further reference made to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India for action.