<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2302 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469403</link>
    <description>A liquidator is not entitled to discharge merely because the corporate debtor has been sold as a going concern where liquidation issues remain unresolved. Here, the NCLT found incomplete statutory filings, inconsistent disclosures, unresolved receivables, bank guarantees, retention money, pending litigations, project status concerns, and no complete final account of realisations and disbursements. The liquidator&#039;s duties were held to continue until a transparent liquidation compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and Liquidation Process Regulations was fully concluded. Discharge was therefore refused at this stage, and a detailed compliance affidavit was directed, with reference made to the insolvency regulator for action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 21:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2302 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469403</link>
      <description>A liquidator is not entitled to discharge merely because the corporate debtor has been sold as a going concern where liquidation issues remain unresolved. Here, the NCLT found incomplete statutory filings, inconsistent disclosures, unresolved receivables, bank guarantees, retention money, pending litigations, project status concerns, and no complete final account of realisations and disbursements. The liquidator&#039;s duties were held to continue until a transparent liquidation compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and Liquidation Process Regulations was fully concluded. Discharge was therefore refused at this stage, and a detailed compliance affidavit was directed, with reference made to the insolvency regulator for action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>