Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a solitary or composite show cause notice covering multiple tax periods is valid in law, and whether the impugned show cause notice and consequential order issued under the GST enactments warranted interference.
Analysis: The petition was decided on the basis that clubbing, consolidation, bunching, or combining multiple tax periods or financial years in a single show cause notice under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is impermissible. Since the impugned notice and the consequential order covered multiple periods, they were treated as vitiated and lacking authority of law. The respondents were left at liberty to initiate proceedings in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The impugned show cause notice and the consequential order were quashed and the petition was allowed in favour of the assessee.