<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1845 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468989</link>
    <description>Clubbing, consolidation, bunching or combining multiple tax periods or financial years in a single show cause notice under the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017 is impermissible. A notice issued for more than one period was treated as lacking authority of law, and the consequential order based on it was also vitiated. The impugned show cause notice and order were therefore quashed, while the respondents were left free to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 20:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1845 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468989</link>
      <description>Clubbing, consolidation, bunching or combining multiple tax periods or financial years in a single show cause notice under the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017 is impermissible. A notice issued for more than one period was treated as lacking authority of law, and the consequential order based on it was also vitiated. The impugned show cause notice and order were therefore quashed, while the respondents were left free to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>