Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty levied under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for failure to furnish the audit report could be sustained when the assessee claimed absence of staff and a part-time accountant leaving without intimation as the explanation for non-compliance.
Analysis: The assessee's turnover exceeded the statutory threshold requiring maintenance of books and audit under section 44AB, yet no audit report was furnished. The explanation offered for the default was held not to constitute a reasonable cause for the failure. On the facts found by the lower authorities, the statutory liability to comply with the audit requirement remained unmet and the penalty was justified.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 271B was rightly confirmed and the assessee's challenge failed.