<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1893 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468780</link>
    <description>Failure to furnish the audit report required under section 44AB attracted penalty under section 271B where the assessee&#039;s turnover crossed the statutory threshold and no report was filed. The explanation that there was no staff and that a part-time accountant had left without intimation was held not to amount to reasonable cause for the default. On the facts found by the lower authorities, the audit obligation remained unfulfilled and the penalty was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 19:00:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1893 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468780</link>
      <description>Failure to furnish the audit report required under section 44AB attracted penalty under section 271B where the assessee&#039;s turnover crossed the statutory threshold and no report was filed. The explanation that there was no staff and that a part-time accountant had left without intimation was held not to amount to reasonable cause for the default. On the facts found by the lower authorities, the audit obligation remained unfulfilled and the penalty was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>