Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay of 159 days in filing the appeal could be condoned in view of the limited appellate jurisdiction under the proviso to Section 61(2) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Analysis: The appeal was filed beyond the period for which the appellate forum could exercise power to condone delay. The proviso to Section 61(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 confines the power of condonation to a further period of 15 days only, and the delay in filing the appeal far exceeded that statutory limit. Once the prescribed outer limit was crossed, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to enlarge time further, irrespective of the explanation offered for the delay.
Conclusion: The delay could not be condoned. The application for condonation of delay was dismissed and the appeal was rejected.