<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1600 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468595</link>
    <description>The proviso to Section 61(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 limits condonation of delay in filing an appeal to a further 15 days. Where the delay exceeds that outer limit, the appellate tribunal has no jurisdiction to enlarge time, even if an explanation for delay is offered. On that basis, a delay of 159 days could not be condoned, the condonation application was dismissed, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 13:09:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1600 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468595</link>
      <description>The proviso to Section 61(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 limits condonation of delay in filing an appeal to a further 15 days. Where the delay exceeds that outer limit, the appellate tribunal has no jurisdiction to enlarge time, even if an explanation for delay is offered. On that basis, a delay of 159 days could not be condoned, the condonation application was dismissed, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>