Reopening of assessment was unjustified on the facts, so quashing of show cause notices was upheld.

On the facts and circumstances, reopening of assessment was not justified, so the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of the show cause notices issued for that purpose. The Court treated the factual basis as insufficient to trigger reassessment proceedings and rejected the challenge to the quashing order. The operative principle is that where the facts do not support reopening of assessment, the court will not interfere with quashing of the notices issued to initiate that process.

---

---

Issues: Whether the show cause notices for reopening assessment were liable to be quashed.

Analysis: The Court found, on the facts and circumstances of the case, that this was not a case for reopening assessment. On that basis, it held that the High Court had not erred in quashing the show cause notices.

Conclusion: The challenge to the quashing of the show cause notices failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the facts do not justify reopening of assessment, the court will not interfere with quashing of the show cause notices issued for that purpose.

---