TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether foreign exchange loss arising from forward contracts was to be treated as non-operating for transfer pricing purposes and the tested party margin correspondingly adjusted; (ii) whether the assessee was entitled to inclusion or exclusion of selected comparable companies on functional and filter-based grounds, including the turnover filter; and (iii) whether working capital adjustment had to be recomputed and granted on the basis of actual comparables data.
Issue (i): Whether foreign exchange loss arising from forward contracts was to be treated as non-operating for transfer pricing purposes and the tested party margin correspondingly adjusted.
Analysis: Comparability analysis under Rule 10B requires reasonably accurate adjustments where material differences affect margins. Where reliable data for uncontrolled comparables is not available, adjustment may be made in the tested party's figures to eliminate the effect of such differences. The loss arising from abnormal movement in forward exchange contracts was treated as a difference materially affecting profitability, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration on that basis.
Conclusion: The foreign exchange loss issue was restored for fresh consideration with a direction to examine the assessee's claim that such loss should be treated as non-operating.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to inclusion or exclusion of selected comparable companies on functional and filter-based grounds, including the turnover filter.
Analysis: Comparable companies rejected or retained on the basis of turnover and other filters were examined in light of functional similarity and the settled view that companies with materially higher turnover may be excluded in transfer pricing analysis. Where no factual distinction was shown, the higher-turnover software development comparables were directed to be excluded. Certain comparables sought for inclusion were remanded for verification of annual results and other factual data, while the remaining exclusion requests were allowed on the same reasoning. Comparables in the IT enabled services segment were also excluded where the turnover filter and functional profile did not support comparability.
Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in exclusion of the disputed comparables in the software development and IT enabled services segments, while some inclusion requests were remanded for verification.
Issue (iii): Whether working capital adjustment had to be recomputed and granted on the basis of actual comparables data.
Analysis: Working capital adjustment is part of the comparability exercise and cannot be denied merely for want of particulars if the necessary information can be gathered through the statutory powers available to the Revenue. The adjustment was directed to be recomputed in accordance with law after calling for the required details from the comparables, if necessary.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to reconsideration and recomputation of working capital adjustment.
Final Conclusion: The transfer pricing dispute was resolved largely in the assessee's favour by remanding the foreign exchange loss issue, excluding several comparables, and directing recomputation of working capital adjustment, resulting in a partly allowed appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: In transfer pricing analysis, material differences affecting margins must be neutralised by reasonably accurate comparability adjustments, and where comparable-company data is insufficient, adjustment may be made in the tested party's results to arrive at a reliable arm's length margin.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
