Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to protection under section 205 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against recovery of demand if tax had been deducted at source on the relevant receipts.
Analysis: Section 205 bars the Revenue from calling upon an assessee to pay tax to the extent tax has been deducted at source. The record, however, showed a factual dispute on whether TDS had in fact been deducted by the payer, and the material placed on record was not independently verified. The conclusion that no tax was deducted, based only on the absence of follow-up action by the assessee against the deductor, was found to be unsupported by evidence. The factual position therefore required fresh examination by the Assessing Officer, including whether TDS was deductible on the payment, whether it was actually deducted, and, if so, the consequence under section 205.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to have the issue re-examined in the light of section 205, and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after verification.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only for statistical purposes, with the disputed TDS credit issue sent back for reconsideration.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax has in fact been deducted at source, recovery of the same tax cannot be enforced against the assessee under section 205 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and a disputed factual finding on deduction must be verified before demand is enforced.