TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether an appeal is maintainable against an order dismissing a contempt application as infructuous. (ii) Whether the party against whom contempt proceedings were closed, but who was not punished, has a right of appeal under the contempt appellate provision.
Issue (i): Whether an appeal is maintainable against an order dismissing a contempt application as infructuous.
Analysis: The contempt jurisdiction under Section 425 of the Companies Act, 2013 is exercised with reference to the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The appellate remedy under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is confined to an order passed in the exercise of jurisdiction to punish for contempt. An order merely closing contempt proceedings as infructuous is not an order of punishment and does not trigger the statutory appeal.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable against the dismissal of the contempt application as infructuous.
Issue (ii): Whether the party against whom contempt proceedings were closed, but who was not punished, has a right of appeal under the contempt appellate provision.
Analysis: The statutory right of appeal in contempt matters is available only to the contemnor who has been punished. A person in whose favour the contempt petition has been dismissed cannot invoke the appellate jurisdiction merely because he was arrayed as opposite party in the contempt proceedings. The filing of the contempt petition and its decision are matters within the exclusive domain of the tribunal or court seized of contempt.
Conclusion: No right of appeal accrued to the appellants, as no punitive order was passed against them.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was held to be incompetent and was dismissed with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: The appellate remedy in contempt matters lies only against a punitive order passed in contempt jurisdiction, and not against an order dismissing or closing contempt proceedings in favour of the alleged contemnor.
TaxTMI 
