https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467829 An appeal against dismissal of a contempt application was held not maintainable because Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 permits an appeal only from an order made in the exercise of jurisdiction to punish for contempt. Dismissal of the contempt petition as infructuous was not an order of punishment, so the party who had brought the alleged non-compliance to notice had no appealable grievance. The Tribunal's decision on whether to entertain or reject contempt remained within its exclusive domain, and no right of appeal arose under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in the absence of a punitive contempt order. en-us Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 Apr 2026 11:21:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467829 An appeal against dismissal of a contempt application was held not maintainable because Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 permits an appeal only from an order made in the exercise of jurisdiction to punish for contempt. Dismissal of the contempt petition as infructuous was not an order of punishment, so the party who had brought the alleged non-compliance to notice had no appealable grievance. The Tribunal's decision on whether to entertain or reject contempt remained within its exclusive domain, and no right of appeal arose under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in the absence of a punitive contempt order. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467829