Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bail could be granted in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act without considering the mandatory requirements of Section 37 of that Act.
Analysis: The respondent had been granted bail in a case arising under Sections 8 and 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The High Court did not examine the mandatory restriction contained in Section 37 of the Act before granting bail. In proceedings under the special statute, compliance with Section 37 was necessary, and bail could not be sustained where that provision was ignored.
Conclusion: The grant of bail was unsustainable and the impugned order of the High Court was set aside.