<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 1034 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467748</link>
    <description>Under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, bail cannot be granted without first applying the mandatory restrictions in Section 37. The Supreme Court held that where the High Court overlooked this statutory requirement before releasing an on bail for offences under Sections 8 and 18, the bail order could not stand and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 12:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 1034 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467748</link>
      <description>Under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, bail cannot be granted without first applying the mandatory restrictions in Section 37. The Supreme Court held that where the High Court overlooked this statutory requirement before releasing an on bail for offences under Sections 8 and 18, the bail order could not stand and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>