Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty levied under the Income-tax Act survived after the underlying assessments were quashed for want of valid approval under section 153D.
Analysis: The appeals concerned penalties imposed with reference to enhanced income for multiple assessment years. The underlying assessment orders had already been quashed by the Tribunal on the ground that the approval granted under section 153D was mechanical, generic, and without application of mind. Once the assessments were held to be invalid and non est, the basis for the penalty proceedings also disappeared, because the penalty was wholly consequential to those assessments.
Conclusion: The penalty could not survive and was liable to be deleted. The assessee succeeded.