Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 16,23,00,000/- made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as unexplained unsecured loan/advance is sustainable.
Analysis: The issue concerns whether the source and genuineness of the receipt identified as unsecured advance were satisfactorily established so as to negate treatment as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Relevant provisions and facts considered include the recorded material advance in the books of the related company as short term loans and advances, the flow of funds between the company and the firm and subsequently to the partners, documentary confirmations and bank account entries admitted as additional evidence, and repayment evidence showing clearance of the advances in a later financial year. The analysis examined whether identity, genuineness and creditworthiness were controverted by independent material; the revenue produced no material disputing the company's recorded material advance through banking channels and did not rebut the circuitous accounting showing reinvestment by partners into the company. On these facts, the source of funds was traced to the material advance and the transaction chain was explained.
Conclusion: Addition of Rs. 16,23,00,000/- under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as unexplained cash credit is not sustained and is deleted; the appeal on this ground is allowed in favour of the assessee.