<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1648 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467379</link>
    <description>Tribunal addressed whether an alleged unsecured advance could be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68 by examining identity, genuineness and creditworthiness through books showing short term loans, bank receipts, inter company fund flows, partner reinvestment entries, documentary confirmations and subsequent repayment. Because the revenue produced no independent material contradicting the recorded bank trail or the accounting chain and the assessee traced the source to the recorded advance, the tribunal concluded the receipt was satisfactorily explained and deleted the addition made under section 68, allowing the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 19:04:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1648 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467379</link>
      <description>Tribunal addressed whether an alleged unsecured advance could be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68 by examining identity, genuineness and creditworthiness through books showing short term loans, bank receipts, inter company fund flows, partner reinvestment entries, documentary confirmations and subsequent repayment. Because the revenue produced no independent material contradicting the recorded bank trail or the accounting chain and the assessee traced the source to the recorded advance, the tribunal concluded the receipt was satisfactorily explained and deleted the addition made under section 68, allowing the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>