Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment and appellate orders sustaining disallowance of carry forward of business loss and addition under section 41(1)(b) should be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh assessment after awaiting the outcome of the pending writ appeal and after granting proper opportunity to the assessee.
Analysis: The assessment arose from additions made after reopening, namely denial of the benefit claimed in respect of carry forward of losses and unabsorbed depreciation following amalgamation, and an addition said to fall under section 41(1)(b). The record also showed that the assessee had challenged the underlying action in writ proceedings, and the Division Bench of the High Court had admitted the appeal and stayed the earlier order. In these circumstances, and noting the grievance of insufficient opportunity before the Assessing Officer, the proper course was to restore the matter so that the assessment could be reframed after the High Court's decision and after giving the assessee a fair opportunity.
Conclusion: The impugned appellate order was set aside and the assessment was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after the High Court's decision and after affording proper opportunity to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the foundation of the assessment is directly dependent on pending higher-court proceedings and the assessee has not been afforded adequate opportunity, the assessment may be set aside and remanded for de novo consideration.