PMLA bail twin condition test denied; constitutional speedy trial protection remains available in exceptional delay, subject to reapplication.

The court addressed five bail issues: (i) PMLA twin conditions require reasonable grounds that the accused is not guilty and not likely to offend; on broad probabilities the complaint and documentary material established a prima facie PMLA case and the twin conditions failed, so Section 45 bail was refused; (ii) a charge report filed within the statutory period met essential particulars and defects were formal, so statutory/default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was denied; (iii) medical records did not show infirmity incompatible with custody, so medical bail under the proviso to Section 45 was refused; (iv) arrest procedures complied with safeguards and did not vitiate custody; (v) 127 days' detention did not amount to excessive delay to invoke Article 21 remedy, but liberty to reapply was reserved.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the accused is entitled to bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (twin conditions). (ii) Whether the accused is entitled to statutory/default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground of an allegedly incomplete Prosecution Complaint. (iii) Whether bail should be granted on medical grounds under the proviso to Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. (iv) Whether procedural defects in the arrest under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 warrant release on bail. (v) Whether long incarceration and prospect of delayed trial ground a grant of bail despite statutory restrictions.

Issue (i): Entitlement to bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (twin conditions).

Analysis: The Prosecution Complaint set out detailed allegations and material indicative of proceeds of crime, layering and transfers to associates. The statutory twin conditions require reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and that the accused is not likely to commit an offence while on bail; the assessment at bail stage is to be made on broad probabilities without weighing evidence as at trial. The record included admissions and documentary charts supporting a prima facie case under Section 3 of the PMLA and the mandatory statutory presumption under Section 24 was noted.

Conclusion: The twin conditions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 are not satisfied; bail under Section 45 is refused.

Issue (ii): Entitlement to statutory/default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on account of an allegedly incomplete Prosecution Complaint.

Analysis: The charge report submitted within sixty days complied with the requirements of Section 173(2) CrPC as interpreted by settled precedent; defects identified by court registry were formal and rectified. Jurisprudence permits filing of a charge report while still reserving scope for further investigation under Section 173(8). A charge-sheet filed within the statutory period that contains essential particulars is not rendered ineffective by subsequent applications for additional prosecution complaints.

Conclusion: The accused is not entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC; the statutory/default bail plea is rejected.

Issue (iii): Entitlement to bail on medical grounds under the proviso to Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

Analysis: Medical records showed ailments treatable within prison/Government hospital facilities and did not demonstrate life threatening conditions or infirmity incapable of being managed in custody. The proviso permits bail where the accused is sick or infirm to an extent that custody is inappropriate.

Conclusion: Medical bail is not merited on the material placed; the medical bail plea is rejected, subject to prison authorities providing appropriate medical care.

Issue (iv): Whether procedural defects in arrest under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 vitiate custody and warrant bail.

Analysis: The remand records and grounds of arrest indicated communication of reasons and compliance with procedural safeguards, including adherence to guidelines reflected in D.K. Basu. The trial court's detailed findings on legality of arrest were endorsed on review.

Conclusion: No procedural defect in arrest was shown that would entitle the accused to bail; the plea based on arrest procedure is rejected.

Issue (v): Whether long incarceration and prospect of delayed trial justify bail despite statutory restrictions.

Analysis: Constitutional jurisprudence permits intervention where prolonged pre trial detention and lack of prospect for trial conclude within a reasonable time infringe Article 21. Authorities recognise that Section 45 PMLA does not oust constitutional protections and that long incarceration and trial delay can ground bail on constitutional principles. The accused's incarceration of 127 days at the time of order was examined against this standard and found insufficiently long to invoke the exceptional constitutional remedy; liberty to reapply was considered appropriate.

Conclusion: Long incarceration and trial delay do not presently justify bail; liberty reserved to the accused to renew the application after three months if circumstances change.

Final Conclusion: On the material and law considered, the application for release on bail is rejected on merits and procedure, with liberty reserved to seek fresh relief after three months in light of trial progress or changed circumstances; prison authorities must ensure necessary medical treatment.

Ratio Decidendi: Where pre trial material discloses a prima facie case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and the statutory twin conditions of Section 45 are not met, bail may be refused; however, constitutional protection of the right to speedy trial under Article 21 can, in exceptional cases of prolonged incarceration and lack of reasonable prospect of trial concluding, justify grant of bail notwithstanding Section 45.

---