Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the orders passed under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are barred by limitation where the issues for which revision is proposed relate to the original assessment order and not to the subject matter of the re-assessment.
Analysis: The limitation for exercising power under Section 263 is two years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed. Where the Commissioner seeks to revise issues that do not arise from the re-assessment proceedings but relate to the original assessment order, the period of limitation is to be reckoned from the date of the original assessment order and not from the date of the re-assessment order. The re-assessment in the present matter was made for distinct reasons on which no additions were made; the revision under Section 263 challenged allowance of standard deduction under Section 24(1) which was not the subject matter of the re-assessment. Reliance is placed on the principle that only where the subject matter of revision relates to issues covered by re-assessment will the limitation run from the re-assessment order; otherwise it relates back to the original assessment order.
Conclusion: The orders under Section 263 are time barred and are quashed. The appeals are allowed in favour of the assessee.